道次减面率配置对304H不锈钢丝拉拔过程中马氏体相变的影响

特殊钢 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (2): 57-61.

道次减面率配置对304H不锈钢丝拉拔过程中马氏体相变的影响

徐钦华¹，彭科²，朱建新¹，程朝阳²，严磊¹，顾强¹，刘静²

1法尔胜泓昇不锈钢制品有限公司，江阴214400；
2武汉科技大学耐火材料与冶金国家重点实验室，武汉430081

收稿日期:2019-10-15 出版日期:2020-04-01 发布日期:2022-04-22
作者简介:徐钦华(1977-)，男，硕士(2003年中国地质大学)，高级工程 W.2000年中国地质大学(本科)毕业,不锈钢研究。

Effect of Pass Reduction Ratio Configurations on Martensitic Transformation During 304H Stainless Steel Wire Drawing

Xu Qinhua¹ ,Peng Ke² ,Zhu Jianxin¹, Cheng Zhaoyang², Yan Lei¹, Gu Qiang¹ ，Liu Jing²

1 Jiangyin Fasten Stainless Steel Products Co Ltd. Jiangyin 214400 ;
2 The State Key Laboratory of Refractory Materials and Metallurgy, Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430081

Received:2019-10-15 Published:2020-04-01 Online:2022-04-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 设计了两种不同的拉拔工艺(减面率/%:工艺一:34.45,31.67,19.00,20.08;工艺二:20.10,19.28,34.64,31.41),研究了道次减面率配置对304H不锈钢丝拉拔过程中马氏体相变、磁性能及力学性能的影响。结果表明:当钢丝总应变量相同时,大减面率配置在前更有利于马氏体转变,其饱和磁化强度更大,反之则马氏体转变量较少,饱和磁化强度较小。钢丝的强度与拉拔真应变呈线性相关,其大小只与拉拔总应变量相关。本试验中,前两个道次减面率为20.10%和19.28%,后两个道次减面率为34.64%和31.41%时,马氏体转变量较少,钢丝的饱和磁化强度较低。

Abstract: In this paper,two different drawing processes (reduction of area /% :process No1 ,34. 45,31. 67,19, 00 and 20.08;process No2,20. 10,19. 28,34. 64,31.41) are designed. The effects of pass reduction of area on martensitic transformation, magnetic properties and mechanical properties of 304H stainless steel in wire drawing are studied. The results show that when the total strain of the steel wire is the same, the large reduction ratio at first and second pass is more favorable for martensite transformation, and the saturation magnetization Ms is larger. Otherwise, the martensite transformation is less,and the saturation magnetization is smaller. The strength o£ the steel wire is linearly related to the true strain of the drawing, and the value is related only to the total strain of the drawing. In the test, as the first two pass reduction ratios are 20.10% and 19.28% ,and the latter two pass reduction ratios are 34.64% and 31.41% ,the martensite transformation is less and the saturation magnetization of the steel wire is weak.

徐钦华, 彭科, 朱建新, 程朝阳, 严磊, 顾强, 刘静. 道次减面率配置对304H不锈钢丝拉拔过程中马氏体相变的影响[J]. 特殊钢, 2020, 41(2): 57-61.

Xu Qinhua , Peng Ke , Zhu Jianxin, Cheng Zhaoyang, Yan Lei, Gu Qiang , Liu Jing. Effect of Pass Reduction Ratio Configurations on Martensitic Transformation During 304H Stainless Steel Wire Drawing[J]. Special Steel, 2020, 41(2): 57-61.

参考文献

[1]孙海生，常春梅,姬平如.奥氏体不锈钢板片冷拉变形诱发形变马氏体体积分数分析[J].石油化工设备，2017,46(1):7-12.
[2]Silva P M D 0,Abreu H F G D, Albuquerque V H C D,et al. Cold Deformation Effect on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of AISI 301 LN and 316L Stainless Steels]J]. Materials ; Design,2011, 32(2):605-614.
[3]Shen Y F,Li X X,Sun X. Twinning and Martensite in a 304 Austenitic Stainless Steel[ J]. Materials Science and Engineering A,2012,552： 514-522.
[4]Liu J,Chen C,Feng Q,et al. Dislocation Activities at the Martensite Phase Transformation Interface in Metastable Austenitic Stainless Steel: An in-situ TEM Study[J ]. Materials Science and Engineering： A,2017,703： 236-243.
[5]覃事品，亚稳态奥氏体不锈钢中应变诱导马氏体相变演化及其本构模型[D].北京:北京理工大学,2015.
[6]Das A, Soumitra Tarafder. Experimental Investigation on Martensitic Transformation and Fracture Morphologies of Austenitic Stainless Steel [J]. International Journal of Plasticity,2009,25(11) •2222-2247.
[7]史金涛，侯陇刚,左锦荣.304奥氏体不锈钢超低温轧制变形诱发马氏体相变的定量分析及组织表征[J].金属学报,2016,52(8): 945-955.
[8] King H W, Larbalestier D C. Austenitic Stainless Steels at Cryogenic Temperatures: "Die Compositional Dependence of the Ms [J]. Ciyogenics,1981,21 (9):521-524.
[9]Kim K N,Kim H W,Shin G S,Efifects of Strain-Induced Martensitic Transformation on the Solid Particle Erosion Behavior of Fe-Cr-C-Ni/ Mn Austenitic Alloys[J]. Tribology Letters,2012,48(3) ：417-424
[10]董红亮.变形量对304奥氏体不锈钢组织和性能的影响[D].南京:南京理工大学：2010.
[11] Talonen J, Hanninen H, Nenonen P. Effect of Strain Rate on the Strain-Induced γ→α',-Martensite Transformation and Mechanical Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steels[J]. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A ,2005,36(2) ：421-432.
[12]刘伟,李志斌，王翔,应变速率对奥氏体不锈钢应变诱发α'- 马氏体相变和力学行为的影响[J].金属学报,2009,45 ( 3):285- 291.
[13]程晓农，戴起勋,王安东.奥氏体钢层错能与马ε氏体相变[J].钢铁研究学报,2003(2):55-58.
[14]Zhao M,Li J C,Jiang Q. Hall-Petch Relationship in Nanometer Size Range[ J]. Journal of Alloys & Compounds,2003,361(1)： 160-164.