1.海洋装备用金属材料及其应用国家重点实验室,鞍山 114009
2.鞍钢集团钢铁研究院,鞍山 114009
3.鞍钢股份有限公司鲅鱼圈钢铁分公司,营口 115007
刘干(1995—),男,硕士,工程师; E-mail:18242221224@163.com;
收稿:2024-06-05,
纸质出版:2025-01-30
移动端阅览
刘干,艾铖珅,李江委等.热轧工艺对低强度IF钢组织和性能的影响[J].特殊钢,2025,46(01):111-116.
Liu Gan,Ai Chengshen,Li Jiangwei,et al.Influence of Hot Rolling Process on Microstructure and Properties of Low-strength IF Steel[J].Special Steel,2025,46(01):111-116.
刘干,艾铖珅,李江委等.热轧工艺对低强度IF钢组织和性能的影响[J].特殊钢,2025,46(01):111-116. DOI: 10.20057/j.1003-8620.2024-00148.
Liu Gan,Ai Chengshen,Li Jiangwei,et al.Influence of Hot Rolling Process on Microstructure and Properties of Low-strength IF Steel[J].Special Steel,2025,46(01):111-116. DOI: 10.20057/j.1003-8620.2024-00148.
在某热轧厂产线成功开发出铁素体区轧制工艺技术的基础上,对比研究了铁素体区轧制和奥氏体区轧制两种热轧工艺对低强度IF钢组织、析出相、宏观织构及力学性能的影响。采用OM、TEM和XRD衍射仪等检测方法,对两种工艺下热轧、冷轧退火IF钢金相组织、析出相以及宏观织构的差异进行对比研究,同时采用拉伸试验机检测冷轧退火后IF钢三
向拉伸力学性能。研究表明,奥氏体区热轧金相显微组织为等轴状铁素体晶粒,铁素体区热轧组织晶为粒沿轧向被拉长呈纤维状;相比奥氏体区热轧工艺,铁素体区轧制最佳工艺参数为加热温度1 150 ℃+终轧温度800 ℃+卷取温度720 ℃,在此工艺下显著降低了屈服强度R
p0.2
,析出相尺寸整体大70~85 nm,但TiN析出相尺寸无明显差异;织构方面,冷轧退火IF钢γ织构更强,主要织构各组元取向分布更集中且强度差异较小,相应
<math id="M1"><mover accent="true"><mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356907&type=
2.28600001
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356924&type=
1.10066664
值提高0.64,
<math id="M2"><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356925&type=
2.37066650
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356911&type=
3.21733332
值降低0.35,大大提高了其深冲成型性能,为推广铁素体轧制工艺的应用提供了技术参考。
On the basis of the successful developed ferrite zone rolling process technology in a hot rolling plant production line, a comparative study was conducted to investigate the effects of two hot rolling processes, on the metallographic microstructure, precipitation phases, macroscopic texture and mechanical properties of low-strength IF steel. OM, TEM and XRD diffraction were used to compare and analyse the differences in metallographic microstructure, precipitation phases and macroscopic texture of IF steel in hot-rolled and cold-rolled annealed condition un
der the two rolling processes, and at the same time, the three-way tensile mechanical properties of IF steel were tested by the ZWICK tensile tester after cold-rolled annealing. The results show that the microstructure of hot-rolled IF steels in the austenitic zone was equiaxed grains, while the grains of hot-rolled IF steel in the ferrite zone are elongated and fibrous along the rolling direction; Compared with the austenitic zone hot rolling process, the optimum process parameters for ferrite zone rolling are heating temperature 1 150 ℃+final rolling temperature 800 ℃+coiling temperature 720 ℃, in which the yield strength R
p0.2
is significantly reduced, and the size of precipitated phases is overall larger by 70-85 nm, but there is no significant difference in the size of TiN precipitated phases; In terms of texture, cold-rolled annealed IF steel γ texture is stronger, and the orientation distribution of each component in the main texture is more concentrated with smaller differences in strength.The corresponding
<math id="M3"><mover accent="true"><mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi><mo>¯</mo></mover></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356913&type=
2.28600001
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356931&type=
1.10066664
value increases by 0.64, while the
<math id="M4"><mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mi><mi mathvariant="normal">r</mi></math>
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356918&type=
2.37066650
https://html.publish.founderss.cn/rc-pub/api/common/picture?pictureId=72356919&type=
3.21733332
value decreases by 0.35, significantly improving its deep drawing formability. This provides a technical reference for promoting the application of ferrite rolling technology.
孙超凡 , 周 旬 , 方 圆 , 等 . 热轧工艺对超薄规格冷轧IF钢织构及成形性能的影响 [J]. 轧钢 , 2023 , 40 ( 3 ): 40 - 46+71 .
王建功 , 王晓东 , 周 旬 , 等 . 铁素体轧制工艺热轧板显微组织研究与分析 [J]. 中国冶金 , 2018 , 28 ( 3 ): 54 - 59 .
程晓杰 , 李 振 , 蔡阿云 , 等 . 连续退火温度对390 MPa级IF钢组织、织构和力学性能的影响 [J]. 特殊钢 , 2014 , 35 ( 3 ): 53 - 55 .
李四军 , 曲家惠 , 王 福 , 等 . 铁素体区热轧IF钢冷轧退火时织构的形成与演变 [J]. 东北大学学报(自然科学版) , 2007 , 28 ( 3 ): 345 - 348 .
吕国成 , 包丽明 , 朱金禄 . IF钢210 t RH精炼过程中调钛时机对洁净度的影响 [J]. 特殊钢 , 2021 , 42 ( 6 ): 25 - 28 .
何国宁 , 蒋 波 , 胡学文 , 等 . 铁素体轧制关键技术与机制研究现状 [J]. 钢铁研究学报 , 2022 , 34 ( 9 ): 895 - 906 .
冯岩青 , 王福明 . 冷轧变形量对Nb-Ti微合金化IF钢组织和性能的影响 [J]. 特殊钢 , 2012 , 33 ( 1 ): 65 - 68 .
王昭东 , 郭艳辉 , 孙大庆 , 等 . IF钢铁素体区热轧和退火过程中织构的演变 [J]. 材料研究学报 , 2006 , 20 ( 4 ): 399 - 402 .
刘战英 , 周满春 , 王 涛 , 等 . IF钢铁素体区热轧工艺参数对深冲性能的影响 [J]. 钢铁研究学报 , 2007 , 19 ( 4 ): 44 - 46+94 .
张志鸿 , 李成亮 , 曹晓恩 , 等 . DC06超低碳钢铁素体轧制工艺生产实践 [J]. 轧钢 , 2021 , 38 ( 3 ): 104 - 108 .
刘启龙 , 邓 勇 , 李华刚 , 等 . IF钢板坯结晶器电磁搅拌数值模拟与工艺实践 [J]. 特殊钢 , 2023 , 44 ( 6 ): 83 - 88 .
夏小明 , 裴新华 , 徐国利 , 等 . IF钢铁素体轧制关键工艺参数的确定及实践 [J]. 轧钢 , 2022 , 39 ( 5 ): 93 - 98+107 .
王建功 , 周 政 , 郝磊磊 , 等 . 铁素体轧制工艺对超深冲钢织构的影响 [J]. 钢铁钒钛 , 2018 , 39 ( 2 ): 157 - 164 .
张建华 , 高 燕 , 刘战英 , 等 . 铁素体区轧制工艺参数对IF钢深冲性能的影响 [J]. 轧钢 , 2007 , 24 ( 2 ): 18 - 21 .
韩 赟 , 邱木生 , 邹 英 , 等 . 高塑性应变比Ti-IF钢组织性能及析出相 [J]. 钢铁 , 2021 , 56 ( 3 ): 77 - 83 .
0
浏览量
1
下载量
0
CSCD
0
CNKI被引量
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
京公网安备11010802024621